A new paper suggests extraterrestrials could also be living
underground or in a base inside the Moon.
The study by Harvard University's Human Flourishing program
further puts forward the idea that UFOs, or unidentified aerial
phenomena (UAP), may be spaceships visiting their Earth-based alien
friends.
Okay so what happened to the claim that in order for there to be life
on other planets they need the same vital things that we humans need:
like oxygen, an atmosphere and other things? That is, as I have said
before, a rather arrogant and stupid assumption since if they are
'advanced' they might not have the same requirements. Also, since we
keep finding new species, it might be that we find something that can
survive without some of these things. It is an assumption that might or
might not be true. In any case these 'scientists' now think otherwise
and expect us to believe them? But it gets much better!
The researchers have investigated so-called 'cryptoterrestrials'.
These could be disguising themselves as humans to fit in, may
have come from Earth's future or might have descended from
intelligent dinosaurs.
Are you kidding me? Descended from intelligent
dinosaurs? This is one of the most insane things I have
ever seen and I have unfortunately seen a lot of insane things. The
only descendants are birds. That's it. Birds. Other
things certainly lived long before dinosaurs: sharks for instance. But
they are not descended from dinosaurs for they are not dinosaurs. But
somehow we are supposed to believe that these 'aliens' might be
descended from dinosaurs! Or perhaps they've disguised themselves as
humans to fit in?
That last one does remind me of something I said years ago: I have no
doubt that many people, those who believe in conspiracy theories of
course, fantasise with the idea that aliens are here and are secretly
mating with humans. Don't get me started on the Babylon Brotherhood with
the reptilian overlords of ours: supposedly but obviously rubbish.
The study was created to offer an alternate 'unconventional' explanation
for UAP sightings and to hypothesize what they might mean, and 'the
possibility that UAP may involve forms of non-human intelligence (NHI)
that are already present in Earth's environment in some sense' that
exist 'alongside us in distinct stealth'.
Exactly why would we want an unconventional explanation that is already
dubious at best? Some people think that the Roswell incident was a Nazi
thing even though the Second World War had ended a few years before.
Certainly they were not all defeated but to suggest that a supposed crash of
'aliens' (and the body that was supposedly found) had anything to do with it
is insane.
As far as non-human intelligence: why the hell are they worried about
non-human intelligence when they clearly lack intelligence themselves? Do
they even know what intelligence means?
Four theories on aliens living near humans are investigated.
The first are human cryptoterrestrials: A technologically advanced
ancient human civilisation that was largely destroyed long ago (e.g. by
flood), but continued to exist in remnant form.
Let me guess. This has to do with the flood myth that the bible talks
about? Do you really think that a single person could get predators and prey
on a single boat in one part of the world let alone all over the world and
to not have the predators eat the prey? But it's even funnier than that!
The suggestion is Moses was only supposed to have his family, as far as
the people go (which of course having the many predators in close proximity
of humans would also not be safe), in which case we're all inbred. Well that
would certainly explain human stupidity! But let's be honest. We do not need
a bloody excuse for that: humans do perfectly fine on their own as the study
clearly demonstrates.
The second are hominid or theropod cryptoterrestrials: A
technologically advanced non-human civilisation consisting of some
terrestrial animal which evolved to live in stealth (e.g., underground).
The paper suggests these could be an ape-like hominid descendant, or
descendants of 'unknown, intelligent dinosaurs'.
Okay so I already talked about the insanity of descendants of dinosaurs
but what about the other ones? Underground? Unless these creatures are
invisible (like the elves of Iceland that numerous Icelanders believe in,
even causing a row with whether to move a rock or not for a church in fear
of causing the wrath of these invisible elves - that some people claim they
had sex with, too!) how come they haven't been found? Okay we have not dug
everywhere but we have dug a lot. And why would they want to live in secret
that long anyway? Also, if they needed oxygen (which clearly they don't
according to the authors as they think they might be on the Moon too) how
could they live underground for that long (I will ignore any technicalities
here like the fact that there are some cities or establishments that are
entirely underground simply because the entire study is so ridiculous and
they could not possibly have thought of it if they even know about it)?
This is about insane as the Hollow Earth conspiracy theory where
supposedly an advanced civilisation is in the Earth despite the fact that
there is this thing on Earth called a volcano - to say nothing else of other
complications.
The only ape-like hominid descendant are humans.
The third cryptoterrestrials are former extraterrestrial or
extratempestrial cryptoterrestrials. These would have arrived on Earth
from elsewhere in the cosmos or from the human future, respectively, and
concealed themselves in stealth, such as in the Moon.
Former? How on Earth (or in space) does that even make sense? But the
human future! It's so ridiculous it's hard to know what to say. Part of that
is because of the crazy problem with time travel: it's a real paradox or
more like many paradoxes. If you travel to the past to fix something you no
longer have a reason to do that thing so why did you go in the first place?
Also if you go that far back in time how do you manage to get back to the
present? And if you don't how will you possibly fit in? You won't. You would
be totally out of place. I would like to know where in the cosmos they think
they might be from: I mean from the sound of it it seems to only be weasel
words, this entire study.
Theory four, dubbed CTH 4, are 'magical Cryptoterrestrials': Entities
which are less like homegrown aliens and more like 'earthbound
angels'.
Of course they are. Angels. Yes that makes great sense to me. About as
much sense as the rest of their nonsense: in other words none whatever.
The paper says these relate to the world inhabited by humans in ways
that are less technological than magical, giving the examples of
'fairies, elves, nymphs'.
Elves? I wonder if the people doing this study are from Iceland. That
might explain at least a little bit - even if not nearly enough.
The academics do conclude that their theories, especially the elves
suggestion, might be hard to take by many people.
They add: 'The principal weakness of CTH 4, by contrast, is its utter
strangeness, particularly for readers schooled to limit themselves to
modes of explanation within the bounds of, say, the standard model of
physics.'
The fact they point out there is a weakness is probably all one needs to
know; that they try and clarify that they mean for those who are 'limited to
modes of explanations within the bounds of, say, the standard model of
physics' is just distraction. What they really mean is for people who are
not out of touch with reality and who aren't conspiracy theorists: kind of
redundant sometimes but even so not always. These claims call very much to
some kinds of delusions.
'While belief in extraterrestrials is tenable, belief in (something
like) fairies is simply not a live option for many scientists.'
I have yet to see any evidence at all that suggest this is tenable:
perhaps more tenable than your fantasies but not tenable. The burden of
proof lies on those claiming that something exists, not those who claim
otherwise. Show the evidence of creatures from or on other planets and then
you can argue it's tenable but until then it's not and it's utter rubbish.
The paper, 'The cryptoterrestrial hypothesis: A case for scientific
openness to a concealed earthly explanation for Unidentified Anomalous
Phenomena' is not yet peer-reviewed.
How surprising! But I bet it would be interesting to read such a review:
it would almost certainly rip it apart as utter tosh: exactly because it is
utter tosh.